Skip to content

Convert vs Microsoft

Based on 21 and 2421 real audits

View Convert details | View Microsoft details
MetricConvertMicrosoftWinner
Performance3839Microsoft
Accessibility9189Convert
Best Practices8386Microsoft
SEO9089Convert
Security6866Convert
TTFB282ms329msConvert
Composite7572Convert
Performance
Convert
38
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Convert
91
Microsoft
89
Security
Convert
68
Microsoft
66
SEO
Convert
90
Microsoft
89
Composite
Convert
75
Microsoft
72

Convert outperforms Microsoft in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Microsoft leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Convert

Choose Convert when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 21 audited Convert sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Convert or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Convert or Microsoft?
Convert sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Convert or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Convert (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Convert or Microsoft?
Convert sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Convert or Microsoft?
Convert sites show lower Time to First Byte (282 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Convert or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Convert may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback