Based on 99 and 1570 real audits
| Metric | Cookie Control | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 36 | Cookie Control |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | Cookie Control |
| Best Practices | 92 | 84 | Cookie Control |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Cookie Control |
| TTFB | 294ms | 371ms | Cookie Control |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | Cookie Control |
Cookie Control outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). core-js leads in no categories.
Choose Cookie Control when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
core-js doesn't clearly lead Cookie Control in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 99 audited Cookie Control sites and 1570 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback