Based on 101 and 1688 real audits
| Metric | Cookie Control | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 36 | Cookie Control |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | Cookie Control |
| Best Practices | 91 | 84 | Cookie Control |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 301ms | 396ms | Cookie Control |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Cookie Control |
Cookie Control outperforms core-js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). core-js leads in no categories.
Choose Cookie Control when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
core-js doesn't clearly lead Cookie Control in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 101 audited Cookie Control sites and 1688 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback