Based on 99 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Cookie Control | Frosmo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 40 | Cookie Control |
| Accessibility | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 100 | Frosmo |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | Cookie Control |
| Security | 66 | 64 | Cookie Control |
| TTFB | 294ms | 715ms | Cookie Control |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Cookie Control outperforms Frosmo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Frosmo leads in best practices.
Choose Cookie Control when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Frosmo when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 99 audited Cookie Control sites and 1 audited Frosmo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback