Based on 99 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Cookie Control | Glider.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 57 | Glider.js |
| Accessibility | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 94 | Glider.js |
| SEO | 91 | 96 | Glider.js |
| Security | 66 | 60 | Cookie Control |
| TTFB | 294ms | 221ms | Glider.js |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Cookie Control |
Glider.js outperforms Cookie Control in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Cookie Control leads in security, composite score.
Choose Cookie Control when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Glider.js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 99 audited Cookie Control sites and 2 audited Glider.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback