Based on 6 and 542 real audits
| Metric | CookieYes | jQuery Migrate | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 46 | jQuery Migrate |
| Accessibility | 81 | 87 | jQuery Migrate |
| Best Practices | 85 | 88 | jQuery Migrate |
| SEO | 88 | 91 | jQuery Migrate |
| Security | 69 | 69 | Tie |
| TTFB | 962ms | 662ms | jQuery Migrate |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
jQuery Migrate outperforms CookieYes in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). CookieYes leads in no categories.
CookieYes doesn't clearly lead jQuery Migrate in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose jQuery Migrate when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 6 audited CookieYes sites and 542 audited jQuery Migrate sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback