Skip to content

core-js vs DISH

Based on 1599 and 1 real audits

View core-js details | View DISH details
Metriccore-jsDISHWinner
Performance3637DISH
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8492DISH
SEO9192DISH
Security6565Tie
TTFB379ms232msDISH
Composite7269core-js
Performance
core-js
36
DISH
37
Accessibility
core-js
88
DISH
88
Security
core-js
65
DISH
65
SEO
core-js
91
DISH
92
Composite
core-js
72
DISH
69

DISH outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (69 vs 72). core-js leads in composite score.

When to choose core-js

core-js doesn't clearly lead DISH in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose DISH

Choose DISH when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 1 audited DISH sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or DISH?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DISH sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or DISH?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or DISH?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or DISH?
DISH sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or DISH?
DISH sites show lower Time to First Byte (232 ms vs 379 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or DISH for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DISH scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback