| Metric | core-js | Element UI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 33 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | core-js |
| Security | 66 | 64 | core-js |
| TTFB | 421ms | 421ms | Tie |
| Composite | 73 | 70 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Element UI in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Element UI leads in no categories.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Element UI doesn't clearly lead core-js in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1726 audited core-js sites and 14 audited Element UI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback