Based on 1599 and 2 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Formidable Form | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 41 | Formidable Form |
| Accessibility | 88 | 100 | Formidable Form |
| Best Practices | 84 | 81 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Formidable Form |
| Security | 65 | 71 | Formidable Form |
| TTFB | 379ms | 248ms | Formidable Form |
| Composite | 72 | 76 | Formidable Form |
Formidable Form outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 72). core-js leads in best practices.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Formidable Form when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 2 audited Formidable Form sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback