| Metric | core-js | FullStory | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 30 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | FullStory |
| Best Practices | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 93 | FullStory |
| Security | 68 | 65 | core-js |
| TTFB | 483ms | 389ms | FullStory |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | core-js |
core-js and FullStory are closely matched, each leading in different categories. core-js has a composite score of 74 while FullStory scores 72.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose FullStory when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2041 audited core-js sites and 15 audited FullStory sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback