Skip to content

core-js vs Funraise

Based on 1599 and 2 real audits

View core-js details | View Funraise details
Metriccore-jsFunraiseWinner
Performance3616core-js
Accessibility8885core-js
Best Practices8488Funraise
SEO9181core-js
Security6567Funraise
TTFB379ms339msFunraise
Composite7272Tie
Performance
core-js
36
Funraise
16
Accessibility
core-js
88
Funraise
85
Security
core-js
65
Funraise
67
SEO
core-js
91
Funraise
81
Composite
core-js
72
Funraise
72

core-js and Funraise are closely matched, each leading in different categories. core-js has a composite score of 72 while Funraise scores 72.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Funraise

Choose Funraise when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 2 audited Funraise sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Funraise?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 16 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Funraise?
Funraise sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Funraise?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Funraise?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 81 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Funraise?
Funraise sites show lower Time to First Byte (339 ms vs 379 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Funraise for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback