Based on 1726 and 4 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Genesis blocks | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 36 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 93 | Genesis blocks |
| Best Practices | 84 | 78 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 83 | core-js |
| Security | 66 | 61 | core-js |
| TTFB | 421ms | 247ms | Genesis blocks |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
core-js outperforms Genesis blocks in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Genesis blocks leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Genesis blocks when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1726 audited core-js sites and 4 audited Genesis blocks sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback