| Metric | core-js | Glide.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 34 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | Glide.js |
| Best Practices | 83 | 85 | Glide.js |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | core-js |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 359ms | 243ms | Glide.js |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Glide.js outperforms core-js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). core-js leads in performance, SEO.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Glide.js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1488 audited core-js sites and 38 audited Glide.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback