Based on 1570 and 179 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Google Play app | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 37 | Google Play app |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | Google Play app |
| SEO | 91 | 93 | Google Play app |
| Security | 65 | 66 | Google Play app |
| TTFB | 371ms | 228ms | Google Play app |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Google Play app |
Google Play app outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). core-js leads in no categories.
core-js doesn't clearly lead Google Play app in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Google Play app when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1570 audited core-js sites and 179 audited Google Play app sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback