Skip to content

core-js vs GSAP

Based on 1650 and 261 real audits

View core-js details | View GSAP details
Metriccore-jsGSAPWinner
Performance3636Tie
Accessibility8889GSAP
Best Practices8487GSAP
SEO9191Tie
Security6666Tie
TTFB387ms364msGSAP
Composite7373Tie
Performance
core-js
36
GSAP
36
Accessibility
core-js
88
GSAP
89
Security
core-js
66
GSAP
66
SEO
core-js
91
GSAP
91
Composite
core-js
73
GSAP
73

GSAP outperforms core-js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). core-js leads in no categories.

When to choose core-js

core-js doesn't clearly lead GSAP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose GSAP

Choose GSAP when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1650 audited core-js sites and 261 audited GSAP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or GSAP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or GSAP?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or GSAP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor GSAP (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or GSAP?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or GSAP?
GSAP sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 387 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or GSAP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback