Based on 1600 and 2 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Higher Logic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 27 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 87 | 75 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 83 | 84 | Higher Logic |
| SEO | 91 | 87 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 378ms | 592ms | core-js |
| Composite | 72 | 70 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Higher Logic in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Higher Logic leads in best practices.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Higher Logic when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1600 audited core-js sites and 2 audited Higher Logic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback