Skip to content

core-js vs History

Based on 1600 and 1 real audits

View core-js details | View History details
Metriccore-jsHistoryWinner
Performance3659History
Accessibility8839core-js
Best Practices8481core-js
SEO9192History
Security6563core-js
TTFB379ms1287mscore-js
Composite7273History
Performance
core-js
36
History
59
Accessibility
core-js
88
History
39
Security
core-js
65
History
63
SEO
core-js
91
History
92
Composite
core-js
72
History
73

core-js outperforms History in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). History leads in performance, SEO, composite score.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose History

Choose History when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1600 audited core-js sites and 1 audited History sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or History?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, History sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (59 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or History?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or History?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 39). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or History?
History sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or History?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (379 ms vs 1287 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or History for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. History scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback