Based on 1600 and 98 real audits
| Metric | core-js | HubSpot Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | HubSpot Analytics |
| Best Practices | 83 | 80 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 378ms | 304ms | HubSpot Analytics |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | HubSpot Analytics |
HubSpot Analytics outperforms core-js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). core-js leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HubSpot Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1600 audited core-js sites and 98 audited HubSpot Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback