Based on 1688 and 99 real audits
| Metric | core-js | HubSpot Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 35 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 80 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | core-js |
| Security | 66 | 65 | core-js |
| TTFB | 396ms | 302ms | HubSpot Analytics |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
core-js outperforms HubSpot Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). HubSpot Analytics leads in TTFB.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HubSpot Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1688 audited core-js sites and 99 audited HubSpot Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback