Skip to content

core-js vs IconScout

Based on 1599 and 1 real audits

View core-js details | View IconScout details
Metriccore-jsIconScoutWinner
Performance3650IconScout
Accessibility8895IconScout
Best Practices8496IconScout
SEO9185core-js
Security6568IconScout
TTFB379ms658mscore-js
Composite7270core-js
Performance
core-js
36
IconScout
50
Accessibility
core-js
88
IconScout
95
Security
core-js
65
IconScout
68
SEO
core-js
91
IconScout
85
Composite
core-js
72
IconScout
70

IconScout outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 72). core-js leads in SEO, TTFB, composite score.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose IconScout

Choose IconScout when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 1 audited IconScout sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or IconScout?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, IconScout sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or IconScout?
IconScout sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or IconScout?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor IconScout (95 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or IconScout?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or IconScout?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (379 ms vs 658 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or IconScout for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. IconScout scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback