Skip to content

core-js vs Impact

Based on 1582 and 27 real audits

View core-js details | View Impact details
Metriccore-jsImpactWinner
Performance3627core-js
Accessibility8889Impact
Best Practices8481core-js
SEO9191Tie
Security6566Impact
TTFB374ms218msImpact
Composite7272Tie
Performance
core-js
36
Impact
27
Accessibility
core-js
88
Impact
89
Security
core-js
65
Impact
66
SEO
core-js
91
Impact
91
Composite
core-js
72
Impact
72

Impact outperforms core-js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). core-js leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Impact

Choose Impact when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 27 audited Impact sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Impact?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Impact?
Impact sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Impact?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Impact (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Impact?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Impact?
Impact sites show lower Time to First Byte (218 ms vs 374 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Impact for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback