| Metric | core-js | iOS app | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 40 | iOS app |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 84 | 87 | iOS app |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | iOS app |
| Security | 65 | 67 | iOS app |
| TTFB | 379ms | 231ms | iOS app |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | iOS app |
iOS app outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). core-js leads in accessibility.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose iOS app when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 62 audited iOS app sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback