Based on 1810 and 10 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Klaviyo Forms | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 26 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 84 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 85 | 77 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | core-js |
| Security | 67 | 72 | Klaviyo Forms |
| TTFB | 430ms | 246ms | Klaviyo Forms |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Klaviyo Forms in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Klaviyo Forms leads in security, TTFB.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Klaviyo Forms when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1810 audited core-js sites and 10 audited Klaviyo Forms sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback