Based on 1570 and 197 real audits
| Metric | core-js | lit-element | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 37 | lit-element |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 87 | lit-element |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 371ms | 279ms | lit-element |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | lit-element |
lit-element outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). core-js leads in SEO.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose lit-element when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1570 audited core-js sites and 197 audited lit-element sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback