Skip to content

core-js vs MathJax

Based on 1582 and 29 real audits

View core-js details | View MathJax details
Metriccore-jsMathJaxWinner
Performance3648MathJax
Accessibility8891MathJax
Best Practices8492MathJax
SEO9193MathJax
Security6564core-js
TTFB374ms316msMathJax
Composite7273MathJax
Performance
core-js
36
MathJax
48
Accessibility
core-js
88
MathJax
91
Security
core-js
65
MathJax
64
SEO
core-js
91
MathJax
93
Composite
core-js
72
MathJax
73

MathJax outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). core-js leads in security.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose MathJax

Choose MathJax when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 29 audited MathJax sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or MathJax?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, MathJax sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or MathJax?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or MathJax?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor MathJax (91 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or MathJax?
MathJax sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or MathJax?
MathJax sites show lower Time to First Byte (316 ms vs 374 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or MathJax for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. MathJax scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback