Skip to content

core-js vs Matomo Analytics

Based on 1570 and 134 real audits

View core-js details | View Matomo Analytics details
Metriccore-jsMatomo AnalyticsWinner
Performance3652Matomo Analytics
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8489Matomo Analytics
SEO9190core-js
Security6565Tie
TTFB371ms430mscore-js
Composite7274Matomo Analytics
Performance
core-js
36
Matomo Analytics
52
Accessibility
core-js
88
Matomo Analytics
88
Security
core-js
65
Matomo Analytics
65
SEO
core-js
91
Matomo Analytics
90
Composite
core-js
72
Matomo Analytics
74

Matomo Analytics outperforms core-js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). core-js leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1570 audited core-js sites and 134 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Matomo Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Matomo Analytics?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Matomo Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Matomo Analytics?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Matomo Analytics?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (371 ms vs 430 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Matomo Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Matomo Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback