Skip to content

core-js vs Mautic

Based on 2041 and 13 real audits

Metriccore-jsMauticWinner
Performance3728core-js
Accessibility8892Mautic
Best Practices8684core-js
SEO9194Mautic
Security6870Mautic
TTFB483ms426msMautic
Composite7474Tie
Performance
core-js
37
Mautic
28
Accessibility
core-js
88
Mautic
92
Security
core-js
68
Mautic
70
SEO
core-js
91
Mautic
94
Composite
core-js
74
Mautic
74

Mautic outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). core-js leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Mautic

Choose Mautic when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2041 audited core-js sites and 13 audited Mautic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Mautic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Mautic?
Mautic sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Mautic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Mautic (92 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Mautic?
Mautic sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Mautic?
Mautic sites show lower Time to First Byte (426 ms vs 483 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Mautic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback