Skip to content

core-js vs Mautic

Based on 1582 and 10 real audits

View core-js details | View Mautic details
Metriccore-jsMauticWinner
Performance3627core-js
Accessibility8890Mautic
Best Practices8479core-js
SEO9193Mautic
Security6566Mautic
TTFB374ms458mscore-js
Composite7272Tie
Performance
core-js
36
Mautic
27
Accessibility
core-js
88
Mautic
90
Security
core-js
65
Mautic
66
SEO
core-js
91
Mautic
93
Composite
core-js
72
Mautic
72

core-js and Mautic are closely matched, each leading in different categories. core-js has a composite score of 72 while Mautic scores 72.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Mautic

Choose Mautic when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 10 audited Mautic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Mautic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Mautic?
Mautic sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Mautic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Mautic (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Mautic?
Mautic sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Mautic?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (374 ms vs 458 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Mautic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback