| Metric | core-js | Modernizr | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 44 | Modernizr |
| Accessibility | 88 | 85 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | Modernizr |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 64 | core-js |
| TTFB | 379ms | 400ms | core-js |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Modernizr |
core-js outperforms Modernizr in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Modernizr leads in performance, best practices, composite score.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Modernizr when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 263 audited Modernizr sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback