Based on 1599 and 120 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Native app preferred | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 37 | Native app preferred |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | Native app preferred |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Native app preferred |
| Security | 65 | 66 | Native app preferred |
| TTFB | 379ms | 299ms | Native app preferred |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Native app preferred |
Native app preferred outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). core-js leads in accessibility.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Native app preferred when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 120 audited Native app preferred sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback