Based on 1683 and 40 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Naver Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 36 | Naver Analytics |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | Naver Analytics |
| Best Practices | 84 | 85 | Naver Analytics |
| SEO | 91 | 93 | Naver Analytics |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 395ms | 453ms | core-js |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | core-js |
Naver Analytics outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). core-js leads in TTFB, composite score.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Naver Analytics when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1683 audited core-js sites and 40 audited Naver Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback