Based on 1582 and 39 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Naver Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 36 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Naver Analytics |
| Best Practices | 84 | 85 | Naver Analytics |
| SEO | 91 | 93 | Naver Analytics |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 374ms | 454ms | core-js |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Naver Analytics outperforms core-js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). core-js leads in TTFB.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Naver Analytics when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 39 audited Naver Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback