Skip to content

core-js vs New Relic

Based on 1582 and 177 real audits

View core-js details | View New Relic details
Metriccore-jsNew RelicWinner
Performance3635core-js
Accessibility8889New Relic
Best Practices8485New Relic
SEO9190core-js
Security6565Tie
TTFB374ms236msNew Relic
Composite7272Tie
Performance
core-js
36
New Relic
35
Accessibility
core-js
88
New Relic
89
Security
core-js
65
New Relic
65
SEO
core-js
91
New Relic
90
Composite
core-js
72
New Relic
72

New Relic outperforms core-js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). core-js leads in performance, SEO.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose New Relic

Choose New Relic when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or New Relic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or New Relic?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or New Relic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor New Relic (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or New Relic?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or New Relic?
New Relic sites show lower Time to First Byte (236 ms vs 374 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or New Relic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback