Based on 1582 and 3 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Oracle BlueKai | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 29 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 77 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 87 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 73 | Oracle BlueKai |
| TTFB | 374ms | 333ms | Oracle BlueKai |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Oracle BlueKai |
core-js and Oracle BlueKai are closely matched, each leading in different categories. core-js has a composite score of 72 while Oracle BlueKai scores 73.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Oracle BlueKai when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 3 audited Oracle BlueKai sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback