Skip to content

core-js vs prettyPhoto

Based on 1930 and 10 real audits

View core-js details | View prettyPhoto details
Metriccore-jsprettyPhotoWinner
Performance3747prettyPhoto
Accessibility8891prettyPhoto
Best Practices8593prettyPhoto
SEO9189core-js
Security6875prettyPhoto
TTFB476ms3423mscore-js
Composite7478prettyPhoto
Performance
core-js
37
prettyPhoto
47
Accessibility
core-js
88
prettyPhoto
91
Security
core-js
68
prettyPhoto
75
SEO
core-js
91
prettyPhoto
89
Composite
core-js
74
prettyPhoto
78

prettyPhoto outperforms core-js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). core-js leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose prettyPhoto

Choose prettyPhoto when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1930 audited core-js sites and 10 audited prettyPhoto sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or prettyPhoto?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, prettyPhoto sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or prettyPhoto?
prettyPhoto sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or prettyPhoto?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor prettyPhoto (91 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or prettyPhoto?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or prettyPhoto?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (476 ms vs 3423 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or prettyPhoto for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. prettyPhoto scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback