| Metric | core-js | Pushly | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 28 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Pushly |
| Best Practices | 84 | 75 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 87 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 64 | core-js |
| TTFB | 374ms | 313ms | Pushly |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Pushly in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Pushly leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Pushly when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 43 audited Pushly sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback