Based on 1570 and 134 real audits
| Metric | core-js | React Router | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 39 | React Router |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | React Router |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | React Router |
| SEO | 91 | 94 | React Router |
| Security | 65 | 68 | React Router |
| TTFB | 371ms | 256ms | React Router |
| Composite | 72 | 75 | React Router |
React Router outperforms core-js in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). core-js leads in no categories.
core-js doesn't clearly lead React Router in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose React Router when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1570 audited core-js sites and 134 audited React Router sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback