Based on 1688 and 14 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Salesforce Audience Studio | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 36 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | core-js |
| Security | 66 | 65 | core-js |
| TTFB | 396ms | 286ms | Salesforce Audience Studio |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Salesforce Audience Studio in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Salesforce Audience Studio leads in TTFB.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Salesforce Audience Studio when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1688 audited core-js sites and 14 audited Salesforce Audience Studio sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback