Based on 1582 and 4 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Salesforce Commerce Cloud | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 21 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Salesforce Commerce Cloud |
| Best Practices | 84 | 83 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 64 | core-js |
| TTFB | 374ms | 275ms | Salesforce Commerce Cloud |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Salesforce Commerce Cloud in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Salesforce Commerce Cloud leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Salesforce Commerce Cloud when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 4 audited Salesforce Commerce Cloud sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback