Skip to content

core-js vs Shareaholic

Based on 1582 and 3 real audits

View core-js details | View Shareaholic details
Metriccore-jsShareaholicWinner
Performance3642Shareaholic
Accessibility8885core-js
Best Practices8480core-js
SEO9187core-js
Security6561core-js
TTFB374ms550mscore-js
Composite7272Tie
Performance
core-js
36
Shareaholic
42
Accessibility
core-js
88
Shareaholic
85
Security
core-js
65
Shareaholic
61
SEO
core-js
91
Shareaholic
87
Composite
core-js
72
Shareaholic
72

core-js outperforms Shareaholic in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Shareaholic leads in performance.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Shareaholic

Choose Shareaholic when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1582 audited core-js sites and 3 audited Shareaholic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Shareaholic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Shareaholic sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Shareaholic?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Shareaholic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Shareaholic?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Shareaholic?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (374 ms vs 550 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Shareaholic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Shareaholic scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback