Based on 1599 and 2 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Sitevision CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 41 | Sitevision CMS |
| Accessibility | 88 | 100 | Sitevision CMS |
| Best Practices | 84 | 90 | Sitevision CMS |
| SEO | 91 | 95 | Sitevision CMS |
| Security | 65 | 64 | core-js |
| TTFB | 379ms | 200ms | Sitevision CMS |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Sitevision CMS |
Sitevision CMS outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). core-js leads in security.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Sitevision CMS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 2 audited Sitevision CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback