Based on 1650 and 4 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Sovrn//Commerce | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 45 | Sovrn//Commerce |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Sovrn//Commerce |
| Best Practices | 84 | 82 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 94 | Sovrn//Commerce |
| Security | 66 | 61 | core-js |
| TTFB | 387ms | 526ms | core-js |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Sovrn//Commerce in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Sovrn//Commerce leads in performance, accessibility, SEO.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Sovrn//Commerce when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1650 audited core-js sites and 4 audited Sovrn//Commerce sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback