Skip to content

core-js vs Statsig

Based on 1570 and 56 real audits

View core-js details | View Statsig details
Metriccore-jsStatsigWinner
Performance3630core-js
Accessibility8892Statsig
Best Practices8488Statsig
SEO9193Statsig
Security6568Statsig
TTFB371ms247msStatsig
Composite7274Statsig
Performance
core-js
36
Statsig
30
Accessibility
core-js
88
Statsig
92
Security
core-js
65
Statsig
68
SEO
core-js
91
Statsig
93
Composite
core-js
72
Statsig
74

Statsig outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). core-js leads in performance.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Statsig

Choose Statsig when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1570 audited core-js sites and 56 audited Statsig sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Statsig?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Statsig?
Statsig sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Statsig?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Statsig (92 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Statsig?
Statsig sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Statsig?
Statsig sites show lower Time to First Byte (247 ms vs 371 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Statsig for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback