Based on 1600 and 170 real audits
| Metric | core-js | styled-components | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 33 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | styled-components |
| Best Practices | 84 | 85 | styled-components |
| SEO | 91 | 93 | styled-components |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 379ms | 321ms | styled-components |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
styled-components outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). core-js leads in performance.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose styled-components when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1600 audited core-js sites and 170 audited styled-components sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback