Skip to content

core-js vs Survicate

Based on 1599 and 11 real audits

View core-js details | View Survicate details
Metriccore-jsSurvicateWinner
Performance3624core-js
Accessibility8886core-js
Best Practices8478core-js
SEO9193Survicate
Security6565Tie
TTFB379ms164msSurvicate
Composite7271core-js
Performance
core-js
36
Survicate
24
Accessibility
core-js
88
Survicate
86
Security
core-js
65
Survicate
65
SEO
core-js
91
Survicate
93
Composite
core-js
72
Survicate
71

core-js outperforms Survicate in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Survicate leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Survicate

Choose Survicate when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 11 audited Survicate sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Survicate?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 24 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Survicate?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Survicate?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Survicate?
Survicate sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Survicate?
Survicate sites show lower Time to First Byte (164 ms vs 379 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Survicate for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback