Skip to content

core-js vs Timesact

Based on 1868 and 1 real audits

View core-js details | View Timesact details
Metriccore-jsTimesactWinner
Performance3728core-js
Accessibility8893Timesact
Best Practices85100Timesact
SEO9192Timesact
Security6779Timesact
TTFB436ms132msTimesact
Composite7480Timesact
Performance
core-js
37
Timesact
28
Accessibility
core-js
88
Timesact
93
Security
core-js
67
Timesact
79
SEO
core-js
91
Timesact
92
Composite
core-js
74
Timesact
80

Timesact outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). core-js leads in performance.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Timesact

Choose Timesact when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1868 audited core-js sites and 1 audited Timesact sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Timesact?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Timesact?
Timesact sites score higher on security analysis (79 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Timesact?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Timesact (93 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Timesact?
Timesact sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Timesact?
Timesact sites show lower Time to First Byte (132 ms vs 436 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Timesact for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback