Based on 2041 and 9 real audits
| Metric | core-js | Treasure Data | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 32 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 85 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 86 | 74 | core-js |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | core-js |
| Security | 68 | 60 | core-js |
| TTFB | 483ms | 478ms | Treasure Data |
| Composite | 74 | 69 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Treasure Data in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 69). Treasure Data leads in TTFB.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Treasure Data when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2041 audited core-js sites and 9 audited Treasure Data sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback