| Metric | core-js | Vue.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 39 | Vue.js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 84 | 89 | Vue.js |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 371ms | 369ms | Vue.js |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Vue.js outperforms core-js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). core-js leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vue.js when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1571 audited core-js sites and 209 audited Vue.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback