Skip to content

core-js vs Wicked Reports

Based on 1599 and 1 real audits

View core-js details | View Wicked Reports details
Metriccore-jsWicked ReportsWinner
Performance3625core-js
Accessibility8880core-js
Best Practices8473core-js
SEO9177core-js
Security6575Wicked Reports
TTFB379ms106msWicked Reports
Composite7270core-js
Performance
core-js
36
Wicked Reports
25
Accessibility
core-js
88
Wicked Reports
80
Security
core-js
65
Wicked Reports
75
SEO
core-js
91
Wicked Reports
77
Composite
core-js
72
Wicked Reports
70

core-js outperforms Wicked Reports in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Wicked Reports leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Wicked Reports

Choose Wicked Reports when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 1 audited Wicked Reports sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Wicked Reports?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Wicked Reports?
Wicked Reports sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Wicked Reports?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Wicked Reports?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 77 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Wicked Reports?
Wicked Reports sites show lower Time to First Byte (106 ms vs 379 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Wicked Reports for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback