Skip to content

Crazy Egg vs HSTS

Based on 66 and 3637 real audits

MetricCrazy EggHSTSWinner
Performance3654HSTS
Accessibility9090Tie
Best Practices8790HSTS
SEO9392Crazy Egg
Security6474HSTS
TTFB768ms421msHSTS
Composite7278HSTS
Performance
Crazy Egg
36
HSTS
54
Accessibility
Crazy Egg
90
HSTS
90
Security
Crazy Egg
64
HSTS
74
SEO
Crazy Egg
93
HSTS
92
Composite
Crazy Egg
72
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms Crazy Egg in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 72). Crazy Egg leads in SEO.

When to choose Crazy Egg

Choose Crazy Egg when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 66 audited Crazy Egg sites and 3637 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Crazy Egg or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Crazy Egg or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Crazy Egg or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Crazy Egg (90 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Crazy Egg or HSTS?
Crazy Egg sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Crazy Egg or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (421 ms vs 768 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Crazy Egg or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Crazy Egg may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback