Skip to content

Criteo vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 110 and 594 real audits

View Criteo details | View DoubleClick Floodlight details
MetricCriteoDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance2932DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8487DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices7681DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9091DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6464Tie
TTFB299ms340msCriteo
Composite7072DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
Criteo
29
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Accessibility
Criteo
84
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
Criteo
64
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
SEO
Criteo
90
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Composite
Criteo
70
DoubleClick Floodlight
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Criteo in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Criteo leads in TTFB.

When to choose Criteo

Choose Criteo when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 110 audited Criteo sites and 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Criteo or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Criteo or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Criteo sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Criteo or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Criteo or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Criteo or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Criteo sites show lower Time to First Byte (299 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Criteo or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while Criteo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback