Skip to content

Criteo vs EX.CO

Based on 110 and 9 real audits

View Criteo details | View EX.CO details
MetricCriteoEX.COWinner
Performance2945EX.CO
Accessibility8491EX.CO
Best Practices7676Tie
SEO9089Criteo
Security6470EX.CO
TTFB299ms462msCriteo
Composite7072EX.CO
Performance
Criteo
29
EX.CO
45
Accessibility
Criteo
84
EX.CO
91
Security
Criteo
64
EX.CO
70
SEO
Criteo
90
EX.CO
89
Composite
Criteo
70
EX.CO
72

EX.CO outperforms Criteo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Criteo leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Criteo

Choose Criteo when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose EX.CO

Choose EX.CO when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 110 audited Criteo sites and 9 audited EX.CO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Criteo or EX.CO?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, EX.CO sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Criteo or EX.CO?
EX.CO sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Criteo or EX.CO?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor EX.CO (91 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Criteo or EX.CO?
Criteo sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Criteo or EX.CO?
Criteo sites show lower Time to First Byte (299 ms vs 462 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Criteo or EX.CO for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. EX.CO scores higher on overall composite score while Criteo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback