Skip to content

Criteo vs Google Analytics

Based on 111 and 2026 real audits

View Criteo details | View Google Analytics details
MetricCriteoGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance2941Google Analytics
Accessibility8487Google Analytics
Best Practices7686Google Analytics
SEO9091Google Analytics
Security6465Google Analytics
TTFB296ms414msCriteo
Composite7073Google Analytics
Performance
Criteo
29
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
Criteo
84
Google Analytics
87
Security
Criteo
64
Google Analytics
65
SEO
Criteo
90
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Criteo
70
Google Analytics
73

Google Analytics outperforms Criteo in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Criteo leads in TTFB.

When to choose Criteo

Choose Criteo when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 111 audited Criteo sites and 2026 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Criteo or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Criteo or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Criteo or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Criteo or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Criteo or Google Analytics?
Criteo sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 414 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Criteo or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Criteo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback