Skip to content

Criteo vs Open Graph

Based on 110 and 3415 real audits

MetricCriteoOpen GraphWinner
Performance2945Open Graph
Accessibility8489Open Graph
Best Practices7687Open Graph
SEO9092Open Graph
Security6466Open Graph
TTFB299ms365msCriteo
Composite7074Open Graph
Performance
Criteo
29
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Criteo
84
Open Graph
89
Security
Criteo
64
Open Graph
66
SEO
Criteo
90
Open Graph
92
Composite
Criteo
70
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms Criteo in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 70). Criteo leads in TTFB.

When to choose Criteo

Choose Criteo when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 110 audited Criteo sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Criteo or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Criteo or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Criteo or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Criteo or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Criteo or Open Graph?
Criteo sites show lower Time to First Byte (299 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Criteo or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Criteo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback